Essay on Wartime Decision

Essay on Wartime Decision Essay on Wartime Decision Essay on Wartime DecisionAs the president of a country that is engaged in a war with another country, I am responsible for my citizens, but I should act ethically in relation to the citizens of other countries as well. I know that the country has a weapons factory from which it produces bombs and ammunitions that it is using to fight my country. The factory is located in a populated area. As the president I have to decide on a course of action, whether to bomb the weapons factory or not. According to military ethicists, â€Å"the pressures and high stakes in war, the moral legal tensions, and resulting conflicts, and the well-trained, but fallible, human beings making the decisions are inescapable sources of moral error† (Roblyer, 2014, p. 34). The choices that confront me and the consequences of each choice involve certain moral or ethical questions.One of the choices that confront me as the president is to bomb the weapons factory, even if it is located in a densely populate d area. In this case, the bombs targeted the weapons factory could kill civilians living or working nearby. I realize that this choice is unethical in relation to these civilians because the bombs could miss their military target, landing on the territory with dense civilian populations. However, it would be a correct choice to stop aggression against my country and my people. I would be able to destroy the weapons factory and my enemies would lack enough weapons to succeed in military operations. In this case, I could even win the war. Nevertheless, I should act ethically because the consequences of my choice could lead to immorality in military decision making. According to researchers, there are the so-called â€Å"neutralizers† that can effectively operate in any â€Å"wartime decision environment† (Roblyer, 2014, p. 32). These neutralizers make any successful decision morally justifiable. The application of ethics to military decision making is part of internation al law ethics (Johnson, 1999).   It is necessary to assess the actual effects of weapons used.Another choice that confronts me as the president is to avoid bombing the weapons factory. This military decision could be regarded as ethical. In this case, the civilians living or working nearby would not suffer. Opposing the use of the bombs on the densely populated areas, I should find another solution to stop the production of weapons. I would be focused on the use of some other strategies aimed at destroying the specific target, the weapons factory. This fact means I would not use the weapon for destroying a large area, but I would plan an operation locally. For example, skilled sabotage demolitionists could do it, avoiding numerous victims among civilians. Undoubtedly, in this case, there would be no serious damage caused to innocent civilians.Thus, it is necessary to conclude that military decisions should be aimed at avoiding striking a target in populated areas, placing innocent people at risk. As the president of my country, I should minimize harm caused to innocent civilians, even if they are the citizens of other countries. Military targets are not worth the lives of civilians. As the president of a country that is engaged in a war with another country, I should follow â€Å"morality of war† based on the legal standards and norms of international law of war.

Legs Akimbo

Legs Akimbo Legs Akimbo Legs Akimbo By Simon Kewin Legs akimbo is a phrase used so much it has become a clichà ©, and clichà ©s are obviously something to be avoided if you want to create interesting, vivid writing. But you should also be aware that legs akimbo is logically meaningless. According to the OED, akimbo means : with hands on the hips and elbows turned outwards (origin, probably from Old Norse). It might just be possible to achieve such a stance in a Science Fiction story (if an alien had arms protruding from its legs), but otherwise, you simply cant stand legs akimbo. Of course, as with many questions of grammar, it could be argued that it doesnt matter that words are being used incorrectly, so long as the reader understands what the writer meant. Its a long-running debate. Language is constantly evolving and new meanings are always emerging. But writers need to be aware of the technically correct usage of words because they need to write in different voices. If, say, they are writing a piece of colloquial dialogue, legs akimbo might well be fine, if thats the sort of thing the character might say. If, however, they were writing in an authoritative, narrative voice, or penning a query letter to a publisher, then the phrase should clearly not be used. Quite how you could get the phrase legs akimbo into a query letter to a publisher, meanwhile, is another matter Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Misused Words category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:100 Beautiful and Ugly Words50 Latin Phrases You Should KnowParticular vs. Specific